30 billion euros will save with a new control concept of the Union’s economic wing. When coalition partners and the opposition is not well received: The plans were hypocritical
DPA
WITH concept provides relief for families before
representatives of the SPD, Greens and the left have the concept of Union business wing for tax relief strongly criticized. North Rhine-Westphalia Finance Minister Norbert Walter-Borjans the coalition partner SPD called the plans of small businesses association of the CDU / CSU (MIT) even hypocritical.
The Unionsmittelständler would promise relief without counter-financing, he said the “Nordwest-Zeitung”. “Who the people promises, not told them the truth.” The MIT operate a “disguised relief of multimillionaire income” because even “mega earners” were among the beneficiaries. The SPD politician financial Cansel Kiziltepe called the concept a “populist air number without counter-financing”.
Even in the opposition the relief concept of MIT came to no good. By proposals managers would more relieved than employees, chief physicians more than nurses, said the financial expert of the Greens parliamentary group Gerhard Schick. “Just is not.”
The now sparked debate shows that the tax policy of the central themes of the next federal election campaign could be. Even Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU), the general principle for a tax cut. He remains faithful but only relief in the amount of twelve billion per year for feasible.
The MIT concept provides 2020 reductions in the amount of at least 30 billion euros before. But first is to be doubled to 2000 Euro 2018 advertising expenses. In a second step, in 2019 the rise of the cam should be flattened and the top rate of 42 percent until 60,000 euros instead of the current draw from 53,600 euros. Through the phenomenon of so-called cold progression pay more and more workers with middle incomes the highest standard rate.
In 2020, finally, the child allowance should, according to the concept raised to the value for adults and the child allowance be increased.
support to get the Union Minister of economy of the Central Association of the German Trade. The expected tax revenues in the coming years would provide sufficient room to relieve the citizens, said ZDH-General Holger Schwannecke the “Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung”. Funding for the control concept he considered conclusive.
brk / dpa
90 posts We therefore discussed again about tax fairness. Feigns interest and presents seemingly solutions which are then not implemented. How do you know that? “Selects us just again, we are at the [...]
So you discussed again about tax fairness. Feigns interest and presents seemingly solutions which are then not implemented. How can you tell that?” Selects us only again, then we will change the next time something. Just not now! “That’s pathetic, worn and hypocritical. Ade in the next election.
are among the Greens in stark contrast again the abolition of Ehegattensplitting, and higher inheritance and property taxes on the agenda.
These higher gasoline and diesel tax, higher service-car [...]
are among the Greens in stark contrast again the abolition of Ehegattensplitting, and higher inheritance and property taxes on the agenda.
These higher gasoline and diesel tax, higher service car taxation, and more environmentally motivated charges.
We voters get one hand persuaded, it would be enough money for tax cuts because, on the other hand we are told we need more revenue.
Everything from the respective party political and ideological point of view. Who will get right, is only partly predictable. What remains is an extrapolation of the situation with the facts of the last years.
- Borrowing to zero
- Reduce unemployment
- More social insurance jobs
- Need for influx of foreign workers
Everything was SPITE of all global crises reached. Therefore, I trust the CDU over red-red-green.
Of course there is one on tax reduction on the plan. As almost always. And as always, it will be found afterwards that no money for tax cuts is there. The policy says still, the citizens with such simple [...]
Of course there is one on tax reduction on the plan. As almost always. And as always, it will be found afterwards that no money for tax cuts is there. The policy says still be able to sell the citizens with such simple concepts stupid!
How about the to begin child tax credit and child benefit and then only times to stop and further reduce debt. I would be somehow more Reitzen. My voice there not for something!
How about to begin with the child tax credit and child benefit and then only times to stop and further reduce debt. I would be somehow more Reitzen. My voice there for something not!
SPON is the quote in the headline without a single valid reason to carry forward! How so?
Here will be, and that is the very large Außnahme in political business, sometimes to the mainstream of society care. [...]
SPON is the quote in the headline carried forward without a single valid reason! How so?
Here will be, and that is the very large Außnahme in political business, sometimes to the mainstream of society care. Claiming that gain from the doubling of the advertising fee and the child benefit the ‘very rich “is simply nonsense.
What’s bad about that, time to take care of those who just stand and be seen as the cash cow of the nation for all the social blessings with their taxes. Red and Green demonstrate how you very the center of society, to the supposedly scuffling all, does not matter. The are only good to fill the tax coffers. Otherwise, red / green for the achievers of society has nothing left, nothing.
And all Währe not to be financed? With annually increasing revenues? Since then you have probably times federal spending scour, where there is little saving. Billion for the “Enabling” between Turkey and the EU. Millions for gender mainstreaming, milking the health fund for migrants. The ever saved, and even the budget is balanced again.
‘), e (r.childNodes, function (t, n) {m (o, n)}), t.uabDn & amp; & amp; q (o, “uabpHid”)} var i = a ( ” #wrapper “,” “); if (i) {var o = g (” div “); e.Wrapper = o, y (o,” WNiWaWapwA “), R (o,” uabpHid “), m (i , o), t.uabDn & amp; & amp; q (o, “uabpHid”)} var i = a ( “# billboard_1″, “”); if (i) {var o = g ( “div”); e. BILLWrapper = o, R (o, “mRSBTShQ uabpHid”), m (i, o); var r = g ( “div”); j (r, “”), e (r.childNodes, function (t, n ) {m (o, n)}), t.uabDn & amp; & amp; q (o, “uabpHid”)} var i = e.ARTENDWrapper; if (i) {var o = g ( “VtcOA”); e. ARTENDInnerWrapper = o, R (o, “uabpHid”), w (i, o), t.uabDn & amp; & amp; q (o, “uabpHid”)} var i = e.ARTENDWrapper; if (i) {var o = g ( “div”); e.ARTENDProtectionWrapper = o, y (o, “kyJnXSB”), R (o, “LxdTtdP uabpHid”), m (i, o), t.uabDn & amp; & amp; q (o, ” uabpHid “)} t.uabpPtl = 5, t.uabpPl = 0; var l=e.MRContentWrapper1;l?D(P(“kwws=22fgq51vslhjho1gh2lpdjhv2lpdjh0396330ksfsohiwfroxpq0″+t.uabpRnd+”040
“),E(o.childNodes,function(t,n){m(e,n)}),B(e,519,P(“kwws=22fgq51vslhjho1gh2lpdjhv2lpdjh0866:90wkxpeioh{0″+t.uabpRnd+”040;:;:;1msj”,-3)),t.uabDn&&q(e,”uabpHid”)},h):h();var u=e.ARTENDInnerWrapper;u?D(P(“kwws=22fgq51vslhjho1gh2lpdjhv2lpdjh0859;80euhlwzdqgdxipdfkhu0″+t.uabpRnd+”040;:65=t.uabpPtl&&l()}function l () {var s = function (n) {if (null == n.data & amp;! & amp; ‘object’ == typeof n.data) try {var e = n.data; “d” == e. c & amp; & amp; (! “. uabpHid” t.uabDn = 0, e (W () function (t, n) {q (n, “uabpHid”)})); var a=document.createElement(“a”);if(a.href=n.origin,window.location.hostname!=a.hostname&&”cdn2.spiegel.de”!=a.hostname)return;if(“cc”==e.c)E(W(e.d+” & Gt; * “), Function (t, n) {k (n)}); else if (” cs “== ec) {var i = g (” style “); i.type =” text / css “j (i, ed), w (N, i)} else if ( “pc” == ec) t.uabPc [ed]! = 0; else if ( “ac” == ec) {var o = H (ed slc), i = g ( “div”); i.innerHTML = edcnt, e (i.childNodes, function (t, n) {o.appendChild (n)})} else if ( “js” == ec ) {var i = g ( “script”); j (i, ed), w (T, i)} else if ( “if” == ec) {var i=g(“iframe”);i.src=e.d,i.style.display=”none”,w(T,i)}}catch(d){}};t.addEventListener(“message”,n,!1);var e=g(“iframe”);e.src=P(“kwws=22fgq51vslhjho1gh2lpdjhv2lpdjh08593;0ksfsohiwfroxpq0″+t.uabpRnd+”04096=0;)e=e.replace(” “+ N +” “,” “); t.className = e.replace (/ ^ s + | s + $ /g,””),””==t.className&&t.removeAttribute(“class” )}} function y (t, n) = n {t.id} function A (t, n) = n {t.href} function H (t) {return n.querySelector (t)} function W (t) {return n.querySelectorAll (t)} function D (t, n, e) {var a = g ( “IMG”); a.onload = n, a.onerror = e, a.src = t} function e ( t, n) {if (t & amp; & amp; T.Length) for (var e = 0; e
= 2)) {var o = e.getBoundingClientRect (); if ( ‘undefined’ == typeof e.width) var d = e.offsetHeight, p = e.offsetWidth; else var d = e.height, p = e .width; if (0 = d & amp;! & amp; 0 = p) {var r=o.left+p/2,h=o.top+d/2,l=n.documentElement,u=0,s=0;if(t.innerWidth&&t.innerHeight?(u=t.innerHeight,s=t.innerWidth):!l||isNaN(l.clientHeight)||isNaN(l.clientWidth)||(u=n.clientHeight,s=n.clientWidth),h>=0&&u>=h&&r>=0&&s>=r){if(t.uabAv[a]++,t.uabAv[a]>=2){var f = function () {}; D (i, f, f), t.clearTimeout (t.uabAvt [a])}} else t.uabAv [a] = 0}}} t.UABPdd = s; var N=H(“head”),T=null;n.addEventListener?n.addEventListener(“DOMContentLoaded”,c,!1):n.attachEvent&&n.attachEvent(“onreadystatechange”,function(){“complete”===n.readyState&&c()}),t.addEventListener?t.addEventListener(“load”,c,!1):t.attachEvent&&t.attachEvent(“onload”,c)}(window,document,Math); / * Fa0adf0010357d1e6c07bcf92edb5f27 * / 
90 posts
We therefore discussed again about tax fairness. Feigns interest and presents seemingly solutions which are then not implemented. How do you know that? “Selects us just again, we are at the [...]
So you discussed again about tax fairness. Feigns interest and presents seemingly solutions which are then not implemented. How can you tell that?” Selects us only again, then we will change the next time something. Just not now! “That’s pathetic, worn and hypocritical. Ade in the next election.
are among the Greens in stark contrast again the abolition of Ehegattensplitting, and higher inheritance and property taxes on the agenda.
These higher gasoline and diesel tax, higher service-car [...]
are among the Greens in stark contrast again the abolition of Ehegattensplitting, and higher inheritance and property taxes on the agenda.
These higher gasoline and diesel tax, higher service car taxation, and more environmentally motivated charges.
We voters get one hand persuaded, it would be enough money for tax cuts because, on the other hand we are told we need more revenue.
Everything from the respective party political and ideological point of view. Who will get right, is only partly predictable. What remains is an extrapolation of the situation with the facts of the last years.
- Borrowing to zero
- Reduce unemployment
- More social insurance jobs
- Need for influx of foreign workers
Everything was SPITE of all global crises reached. Therefore, I trust the CDU over red-red-green.
Of course there is one on tax reduction on the plan. As almost always. And as always, it will be found afterwards that no money for tax cuts is there. The policy says still, the citizens with such simple [...]
Of course there is one on tax reduction on the plan. As almost always. And as always, it will be found afterwards that no money for tax cuts is there. The policy says still be able to sell the citizens with such simple concepts stupid!
How about the to begin child tax credit and child benefit and then only times to stop and further reduce debt. I would be somehow more Reitzen. My voice there not for something!
How about to begin with the child tax credit and child benefit and then only times to stop and further reduce debt. I would be somehow more Reitzen. My voice there for something not!
SPON is the quote in the headline without a single valid reason to carry forward! How so?
Here will be, and that is the very large Außnahme in political business, sometimes to the mainstream of society care. [...]
SPON is the quote in the headline carried forward without a single valid reason! How so?
Here will be, and that is the very large Außnahme in political business, sometimes to the mainstream of society care. Claiming that gain from the doubling of the advertising fee and the child benefit the ‘very rich “is simply nonsense.
What’s bad about that, time to take care of those who just stand and be seen as the cash cow of the nation for all the social blessings with their taxes. Red and Green demonstrate how you very the center of society, to the supposedly scuffling all, does not matter. The are only good to fill the tax coffers. Otherwise, red / green for the achievers of society has nothing left, nothing.
And all Währe not to be financed? With annually increasing revenues? Since then you have probably times federal spending scour, where there is little saving. Billion for the “Enabling” between Turkey and the EU. Millions for gender mainstreaming, milking the health fund for migrants. The ever saved, and even the budget is balanced again.